20 años de experiencia en trasplante renal en bloque de donantes pediátricos en receptores adultos / A 20-year experience in cadaveric pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation in adult recipients

Introducción y objetivos El trasplante renal en bloque de donantes pediátricos en receptores adultos permite aumentar el pool de donantes, pero son pocos los centros que lo realizan. Mostramos los resultados de la técnica en nuestro centro tras su introducción en el año 1999.Material y métodos Análisis retrospectivo de los 42 procedimientos realizados en nuestro centro con una mediana de seguimiento de 73 meses (5-233) en los que se monitorizó la función renal de los pacientes y se registraron las complicaciones sucedidas.Resultados Se han realizado 42 trasplantes renales en bloque en adultos de donantes pediátricos en nuestro centro hasta el momento. La media de edad de los receptores fue de 44,1±11,8 años y la de los donantes de 22,4±14,7 meses, con un peso medio de 11,3±3,6kg. El tiempo medio de isquemia fría fue de 15,7±4,5 h. Al finalizar el seguimiento, 35 injertos eran funcionantes (83,3%) y mantenían una excelente función. Hubo 7 pérdidas de injerto (16,7%) en el postoperatorio inmediato (4 trombosis vasculares, una dehiscencia de anastomosis y 2necrosis corticales) y un fallecimiento durante el seguimiento por una causa no relacionada.Conclusiones El uso de injertos renales en bloque de origen pediátrico en adultos es un procedimiento seguro y con un excelente rendimiento funcional a medio y largo plazo. El postoperatorio inmediato es el periodo en el que se establecen la mayoría de las complicaciones importantes que pueden derivar en la pérdida del injerto. La adecuada selección de donantes y receptores, así como una correcta técnica quirúrgica, son imprescindibles para minimizar la aparición de eventos adversos (AU)

Background En bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors into adult recipients increases the donor pool. However, this surgical procedure is not widely performed in many transplant centers. To evaluate the long-term outcomes of bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors into adult recipients in a single center.Material and methods Retrospective analysis of 42 patients who received pediatric cadaveric bloc kidney transplantation in our center since 1999. Median follow-up period was 73 months (5-233) in which renal function tests were taken and complications registered.ResultsWe have performed 42 bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors into adult recipients in our center. The recipients’ age was 44.1±11.8 years. Pediatric donors were 22.4±14.7 months old and weighted 11.3±3.6kg. Cold ischemia time was 15.7±4.5hours. During a median follow-up of 73 months, 35 patients (83.3%) had graft survival with excellent function (first-year serum creatinine levels of 0.99±0.25mg/dl). There were 7graft losses (16.7%) in the immediate postoperative period (4 cases of vascular thrombosis, one anastomosis dehiscence and 2cortical necrosis).Conclusions The pediatric en bloc renal graft transplantation into adults is a safe technique with excellent medium- to long-term functional performance. The vast majority of significant complications leading to graft loss were reported in the immediate postoperative period. A good selection of donors and recipients as well as an adequate surgical technique are essential to minimize the occurrence of adverse events (AU)

A 20-year experience in cadaveric pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation in adult recipients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: En bloc kidney transplantation (EBKT) from pediatric donors into adult recipients increases the donor pool. However, this surgical procedure is not widely performed in many transplant centers. To evaluate the long-term outcomes of EBKT from pediatric donors into adult recipients in a single center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 42 patients who received pediatric cadaveric EBKT in our center since 1999. Median follow-up period was 73 months (5-233) in which renal function tests were taken and complications registered. RESULTS: We have performed 42 EBKT from pediatric donors into adult recipients in our center. The recipients' age was 44.1 ± 11.8 years. Pediatric donors were 22.4 ± 14.7 months old and weighted 11.3 ± 3.6 kg. Cold ischemia time was 15.7 ± 4.5 h. During a median follow-up of 73 months, 35 patients (83.3%) had graft survival with excellent function (first-year serum creatinine levels of 0.99 ± 0.25 mg/dl). There were seven graft losses (16.7%) in the immediate postoperative period (four cases of vascular thrombosis, one anastomosis dehiscence and two cortical necrosis). CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric en bloc renal graft transplantation into adults is a safe technique with excellent medium- to long-term functional performance. The vast majority of significant complications leading to graft loss were reported in the immediate postoperative period. A good selection of donors and recipients as well as an adequate surgical technique are essential to minimize the occurrence of adverse events.

Time to second kidney transplantation in young adults after failed pediatric kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND: Under the current kidney allocation system, pediatric candidates listed prior to age 18 receive priority for high-quality deceased donor organs. This has resulted in a decline in living donor transplantation in pediatrics, despite superior outcomes of living donor transplantation. Due to a young age at transplantation, most pediatric kidney transplant recipients require re-transplantation. The effects of a previously failed deceased donor vs a previously failed living donor on re-transplant candidates are unknown. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we examined 2772 re-transplant recipients aged 18-30 years at time of relisting for second KT from 2000 to 2018 with history of prior pediatric KT (age ≤ 18 years). RESULTS: PFLDKT recipients compared to those with PFDDKT had shorter median waiting times and dialysis time regardless of their second donor type (14.0 vs 20.3 months, and 19.1 vs 34.5 months, respectively). PFLDKT recipients had higher re-transplant rates (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.27, and adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.15 when calculating from time of relisting and time of returning to dialysis, respectively). PFDDKT recipients were more likely to have higher median PRA levels (90% vs 73%). CONCLUSIONS: Re-transplant candidates who received a previous deceased donor as a child had a higher level of sensitization, longer waiting time, and dialysis exposure compared to those with PFLDKT. Among primary pediatric kidney transplant candidates, consideration should be considered for living donor transplantation, despite the priority for deceased donor organs, to avoid increased sensitization and longer waiting times for with re-transplantation.

Encouraging Split Liver Transplantation for Two Adult Recipients to Mitigate the High Incidence of Wait-list Mortality in The Setting of Extreme Shortage of Deceased Donors.

Background: Organ demand for liver transplantation (LT) is constantly increasing. Split liver transplantation (SPLT) is an ideal option for increasing the number of available liver grafts for transplantation and ameliorating organ shortage to a certain degree. However, SPLT for two adult recipients is still not broadly applied. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of SPLT for adult recipients at a single center. All donor, recipient, and transplantation factors were thoroughly investigated to clarify factors affecting patient outcomes after LT. Results: One hundred consecutive adult SPLTs were performed during the study period. Early mortality and 1-year mortality occurred in 21 and 31 recipients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, graft weight (p = 0.036, odds ratio = 0.99, 95% confidence interval = 0.98-0.99) was the independent risk factor associated with early mortality; however, no factor was significantly related to 1-year mortality. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a graft weight of 580 g was identified the cutoff for stratifying outcomes. Recipients transplanted with a graft weighing ≥580 g had significantly better outcome as compared with other recipients (p = 0.001). Moreover, SPLT remarkably provided a better survival benefit for recipients than those on the LT wait-list (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Given the considerable incidence of wait-list mortality, SPLT for two adult recipients should be encouraged whenever possible to increase the donor pool and benefit patients awaiting LT. Nonetheless, caution should be taken with a smaller graft weight owing to the risk of early graft loss.